![For the equation W1 = Q1- Q2 in the example below, Why is the Second Law of Thermodynamics is NOT relevant ? : r/thermodynamics For the equation W1 = Q1- Q2 in the example below, Why is the Second Law of Thermodynamics is NOT relevant ? : r/thermodynamics](https://preview.redd.it/9gedrj9i9ly41.jpg?width=539&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6d3ac43a2e878497ca37c041b4c9155122466818)
For the equation W1 = Q1- Q2 in the example below, Why is the Second Law of Thermodynamics is NOT relevant ? : r/thermodynamics
![Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Planning & Education Workflow Analysis & Redesign Configuration, Testing & Training Go Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Planning & Education Workflow Analysis & Redesign Configuration, Testing & Training Go](https://slideplayer.com/7555401/24/images/slide_1.jpg)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Planning & Education Workflow Analysis & Redesign Configuration, Testing & Training Go
![Three point charges q1, q2, and q3 are situated at three corners of a rectangle as shown in the diagram below. Where q1 = +7.00 \mu C, q2 = -7.00 \mu C Three point charges q1, q2, and q3 are situated at three corners of a rectangle as shown in the diagram below. Where q1 = +7.00 \mu C, q2 = -7.00 \mu C](https://homework.study.com/cimages/multimages/16/currentproblem6449137914721563937.png)
Three point charges q1, q2, and q3 are situated at three corners of a rectangle as shown in the diagram below. Where q1 = +7.00 \mu C, q2 = -7.00 \mu C
![SOLVED: The figure shows three charges Q1, Q2 and Q3 fixed in place at the corners of an equilateral triangle. 03 Q1 Q2 DATA: Ail three charges have equal magnitude |Q1/-/Q2/-/Q3 . SOLVED: The figure shows three charges Q1, Q2 and Q3 fixed in place at the corners of an equilateral triangle. 03 Q1 Q2 DATA: Ail three charges have equal magnitude |Q1/-/Q2/-/Q3 .](https://cdn.numerade.com/ask_images/9941d81047a9418ab6a3685000983335.jpg)